Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT deleted the addition for unexplained investment/purchases because the Revenue failed to produce material directly linking the assessee to the alleged unaccounted transactions with Tirth Gold. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had furnished ledger accounts, bank statement, GST registration certificate and a declaration from Tirth Gold stating that no sales were made to the assessee for the relevant assessment year, but these documents were overlooked. Reliance only on third-party statements and digital data, without corroboration identifying the assessee as involved in undisclosed purchases or investment, was insufficient to sustain the addition. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT deleted the addition for unexplained investment/purchases because the Revenue failed to produce material directly linking the assessee to the alleged unaccounted transactions with Tirth Gold. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had furnished ledger accounts, bank statement, GST registration certificate and a declaration from Tirth Gold stating that no sales were made to the assessee for the relevant assessment year, but these documents were overlooked. Reliance only on third-party statements and digital data, without corroboration identifying the assessee as involved in undisclosed purchases or investment, was insufficient to sustain the addition. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
