Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The ITAT deleted the addition for unexplained investment/purchases because the Revenue failed to produce material directly linking the assessee to the alleged unaccounted transactions with Tirth Gold. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had furnished ledger accounts, bank statement, GST registration certificate and a declaration from Tirth Gold stating that no sales were made to the assessee for the relevant assessment year, but these documents were overlooked. Reliance only on third-party statements and digital data, without corroboration identifying the assessee as involved in undisclosed purchases or investment, was insufficient to sustain the addition. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT deleted the addition for unexplained investment/purchases because the Revenue failed to produce material directly linking the assessee to the alleged unaccounted transactions with Tirth Gold. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had furnished ledger accounts, bank statement, GST registration certificate and a declaration from Tirth Gold stating that no sales were made to the assessee for the relevant assessment year, but these documents were overlooked. Reliance only on third-party statements and digital data, without corroboration identifying the assessee as involved in undisclosed purchases or investment, was insufficient to sustain the addition. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
