Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT deleted the addition for unexplained investment/purchases because the Revenue failed to produce material directly linking the assessee to the alleged unaccounted transactions with Tirth Gold. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had furnished ledger accounts, bank statement, GST registration certificate and a declaration from Tirth Gold stating that no sales were made to the assessee for the relevant assessment year, but these documents were overlooked. Reliance only on third-party statements and digital data, without corroboration identifying the assessee as involved in undisclosed purchases or investment, was insufficient to sustain the addition. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT deleted the addition for unexplained investment/purchases because the Revenue failed to produce material directly linking the assessee to the alleged unaccounted transactions with Tirth Gold. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had furnished ledger accounts, bank statement, GST registration certificate and a declaration from Tirth Gold stating that no sales were made to the assessee for the relevant assessment year, but these documents were overlooked. Reliance only on third-party statements and digital data, without corroboration identifying the assessee as involved in undisclosed purchases or investment, was insufficient to sustain the addition. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
