Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Penalty under section 270A was deleted because the assessee had made a deduction claim under section 80GGC, and the Assessing Officer had examined that claim; mere disallowance of the deduction did not, on these facts, establish under-reporting or misreporting. The Tribunal also held the penalty order unsustainable because it did not specify the applicable limb of section 270A or set out the particulars required to satisfy sub-section (9). As the statutory basis and necessary ingredients were not properly identified, the penalty could not be sustained.
Penalty under section 270A was deleted because the assessee had made a deduction claim under section 80GGC, and the Assessing Officer had examined that claim; mere disallowance of the deduction did not, on these facts, establish under-reporting or misreporting. The Tribunal also held the penalty order unsustainable because it did not specify the applicable limb of section 270A or set out the particulars required to satisfy sub-section (9). As the statutory basis and necessary ingredients were not properly identified, the penalty could not be sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
