Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Pre-commencement R&D deduction denied where business had not commenced; deeming benefit requires tangible start of manufacture or commercial exploitat...
A receipt under a collaboration agreement was treated as a business transaction, not an unexplained cash credit, because it moved through account-to-account banking channels and the payer's bank account showed no cash deposit before transfer. The assessee produced corporate records, PAN, returns, accounts and bank statements establishing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness; once that material was filed, the burden shifted to the department, which was not discharged. The Tribunal found the accommodation entry allegation unsupported by enquiry and based on suspicion, and deleted the section 68 addition. The reassessment ground was left open and not decided.
A receipt under a collaboration agreement was treated as a business transaction, not an unexplained cash credit, because it moved through account-to-account banking channels and the payer's bank account showed no cash deposit before transfer. The assessee produced corporate records, PAN, returns, accounts and bank statements establishing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness; once that material was filed, the burden shifted to the department, which was not discharged. The Tribunal found the accommodation entry allegation unsupported by enquiry and based on suspicion, and deleted the section 68 addition. The reassessment ground was left open and not decided.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.