Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
For squared up loans, the surviving cash credit addition under section 68 was set aside for fresh adjudication because the assessee had now produced creditor confirmations and sought an effective opportunity, while the earlier record was found incomplete on identity, creditworthiness and genuineness. For three non-squared up loan creditors, the addition was deleted because the assessee had filed primary evidence such as returns, balance sheets, bank statements and confirmations, the creditors responded to notices, and the Revenue failed to rebut that evidence with cogent material; suspicion could not replace proof. The related interest disallowance was held to be consequential and was directed to be recomputed in line with the final treatment of the loan additions.
For squared up loans, the surviving cash credit addition under section 68 was set aside for fresh adjudication because the assessee had now produced creditor confirmations and sought an effective opportunity, while the earlier record was found incomplete on identity, creditworthiness and genuineness. For three non-squared up loan creditors, the addition was deleted because the assessee had filed primary evidence such as returns, balance sheets, bank statements and confirmations, the creditors responded to notices, and the Revenue failed to rebut that evidence with cogent material; suspicion could not replace proof. The related interest disallowance was held to be consequential and was directed to be recomputed in line with the final treatment of the loan additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.