Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
For squared up loans, the surviving cash credit addition under section 68 was set aside for fresh adjudication because the assessee had now produced creditor confirmations and sought an effective opportunity, while the earlier record was found incomplete on identity, creditworthiness and genuineness. For three non-squared up loan creditors, the addition was deleted because the assessee had filed primary evidence such as returns, balance sheets, bank statements and confirmations, the creditors responded to notices, and the Revenue failed to rebut that evidence with cogent material; suspicion could not replace proof. The related interest disallowance was held to be consequential and was directed to be recomputed in line with the final treatment of the loan additions.
For squared up loans, the surviving cash credit addition under section 68 was set aside for fresh adjudication because the assessee had now produced creditor confirmations and sought an effective opportunity, while the earlier record was found incomplete on identity, creditworthiness and genuineness. For three non-squared up loan creditors, the addition was deleted because the assessee had filed primary evidence such as returns, balance sheets, bank statements and confirmations, the creditors responded to notices, and the Revenue failed to rebut that evidence with cogent material; suspicion could not replace proof. The related interest disallowance was held to be consequential and was directed to be recomputed in line with the final treatment of the loan additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.