Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where reassessment was triggered by documents found in a search on a third party, the Revenue had to proceed under the special search-assessment mechanism for "other person" cases and could not invoke general reassessment under section 147 on the same material. The Tribunal held that assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 was invalid because the very basis of action arose from third-party search material, and the reassessment was therefore vitiated. The remaining grounds were treated as academic, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed.
Where reassessment was triggered by documents found in a search on a third party, the Revenue had to proceed under the special search-assessment mechanism for "other person" cases and could not invoke general reassessment under section 147 on the same material. The Tribunal held that assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 was invalid because the very basis of action arose from third-party search material, and the reassessment was therefore vitiated. The remaining grounds were treated as academic, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.