Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where reassessment was triggered by documents found in a search on a third party, the Revenue had to proceed under the special search-assessment mechanism for "other person" cases and could not invoke general reassessment under section 147 on the same material. The Tribunal held that assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 was invalid because the very basis of action arose from third-party search material, and the reassessment was therefore vitiated. The remaining grounds were treated as academic, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed.
Where reassessment was triggered by documents found in a search on a third party, the Revenue had to proceed under the special search-assessment mechanism for "other person" cases and could not invoke general reassessment under section 147 on the same material. The Tribunal held that assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 was invalid because the very basis of action arose from third-party search material, and the reassessment was therefore vitiated. The remaining grounds were treated as academic, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.