Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Where reassessment was triggered by documents found in a search on a third party, the Revenue had to proceed under the special search-assessment mechanism for "other person" cases and could not invoke general reassessment under section 147 on the same material. The Tribunal held that assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 was invalid because the very basis of action arose from third-party search material, and the reassessment was therefore vitiated. The remaining grounds were treated as academic, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed.
Where reassessment was triggered by documents found in a search on a third party, the Revenue had to proceed under the special search-assessment mechanism for "other person" cases and could not invoke general reassessment under section 147 on the same material. The Tribunal held that assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 was invalid because the very basis of action arose from third-party search material, and the reassessment was therefore vitiated. The remaining grounds were treated as academic, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.