Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where reassessment was triggered by documents found in a search on a third party, the Revenue had to proceed under the special search-assessment mechanism for "other person" cases and could not invoke general reassessment under section 147 on the same material. The Tribunal held that assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 was invalid because the very basis of action arose from third-party search material, and the reassessment was therefore vitiated. The remaining grounds were treated as academic, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed.
Where reassessment was triggered by documents found in a search on a third party, the Revenue had to proceed under the special search-assessment mechanism for "other person" cases and could not invoke general reassessment under section 147 on the same material. The Tribunal held that assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 was invalid because the very basis of action arose from third-party search material, and the reassessment was therefore vitiated. The remaining grounds were treated as academic, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.