Content ownership determines GST treatment of printed publications: customer-supplied text is a taxable printing service, owned content is exempt good...
Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
The challenge to cancellation of scrips and imposition of penalty was correctly relegated to the statutory appellate remedy, leaving those issues open before the competent authority. However, the communication marking the appellant to the Denied Entity List was quashed because it effectively disabled import-export operations and was issued without the written notice, disclosure of grounds, opportunity to represent, and hearing required for suspension or cancellation of an Importer-exporter Code. The Court treated this as a breach of natural justice and non-compliance with the statutory procedure, while granting liberty to proceed afresh with a compliant notice.
The challenge to cancellation of scrips and imposition of penalty was correctly relegated to the statutory appellate remedy, leaving those issues open before the competent authority. However, the communication marking the appellant to the Denied Entity List was quashed because it effectively disabled import-export operations and was issued without the written notice, disclosure of grounds, opportunity to represent, and hearing required for suspension or cancellation of an Importer-exporter Code. The Court treated this as a breach of natural justice and non-compliance with the statutory procedure, while granting liberty to proceed afresh with a compliant notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.