Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Prior appellate adjudication had already conclusively rejected inclusion of the foreign oil and gas assets in the CIRP of Videocon Industries Ltd, so the later order directing inclusion could not stand. The Tribunal also held that a holding company and its subsidiary remain separate legal persons, and that co-extensive guarantor liability does not permit importing a subsidiary's assets into the guarantor's CIRP. On the resolution plan challenge, it accepted that pre-existing contractual rights, including a right of first refusal, could be respected because an approved plan must be implementable and the Committee of Creditors could, in its commercial wisdom, pursue a feasible value-maximising structure. The order approving consummation of the BPRL transaction was upheld.
Prior appellate adjudication had already conclusively rejected inclusion of the foreign oil and gas assets in the CIRP of Videocon Industries Ltd, so the later order directing inclusion could not stand. The Tribunal also held that a holding company and its subsidiary remain separate legal persons, and that co-extensive guarantor liability does not permit importing a subsidiary's assets into the guarantor's CIRP. On the resolution plan challenge, it accepted that pre-existing contractual rights, including a right of first refusal, could be respected because an approved plan must be implementable and the Committee of Creditors could, in its commercial wisdom, pursue a feasible value-maximising structure. The order approving consummation of the BPRL transaction was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.