Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Prior appellate adjudication had already conclusively rejected inclusion of the foreign oil and gas assets in the CIRP of Videocon Industries Ltd, so the later order directing inclusion could not stand. The Tribunal also held that a holding company and its subsidiary remain separate legal persons, and that co-extensive guarantor liability does not permit importing a subsidiary's assets into the guarantor's CIRP. On the resolution plan challenge, it accepted that pre-existing contractual rights, including a right of first refusal, could be respected because an approved plan must be implementable and the Committee of Creditors could, in its commercial wisdom, pursue a feasible value-maximising structure. The order approving consummation of the BPRL transaction was upheld.
Prior appellate adjudication had already conclusively rejected inclusion of the foreign oil and gas assets in the CIRP of Videocon Industries Ltd, so the later order directing inclusion could not stand. The Tribunal also held that a holding company and its subsidiary remain separate legal persons, and that co-extensive guarantor liability does not permit importing a subsidiary's assets into the guarantor's CIRP. On the resolution plan challenge, it accepted that pre-existing contractual rights, including a right of first refusal, could be respected because an approved plan must be implementable and the Committee of Creditors could, in its commercial wisdom, pursue a feasible value-maximising structure. The order approving consummation of the BPRL transaction was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.