Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
A miscellaneous application filed after disposal was held maintainable only for correction of clerical or arithmetical errors, or in exceptional cases where an executory order becomes impossible because of later events; it could not be used to rewrite the final order, and was dismissed as a disguised review and abuse of process. The Court also held that the signed order uploaded after chamber corrections alone constituted the final operative order. Changes from the dictated draft, including disposal with liberty to pursue remedies and omission of a status quo direction, were treated as permissible refinement and correction rather than material alteration requiring rehearing.
A miscellaneous application filed after disposal was held maintainable only for correction of clerical or arithmetical errors, or in exceptional cases where an executory order becomes impossible because of later events; it could not be used to rewrite the final order, and was dismissed as a disguised review and abuse of process. The Court also held that the signed order uploaded after chamber corrections alone constituted the final operative order. Changes from the dictated draft, including disposal with liberty to pursue remedies and omission of a status quo direction, were treated as permissible refinement and correction rather than material alteration requiring rehearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.