Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A miscellaneous application filed after disposal was held maintainable only for correction of clerical or arithmetical errors, or in exceptional cases where an executory order becomes impossible because of later events; it could not be used to rewrite the final order, and was dismissed as a disguised review and abuse of process. The Court also held that the signed order uploaded after chamber corrections alone constituted the final operative order. Changes from the dictated draft, including disposal with liberty to pursue remedies and omission of a status quo direction, were treated as permissible refinement and correction rather than material alteration requiring rehearing.
A miscellaneous application filed after disposal was held maintainable only for correction of clerical or arithmetical errors, or in exceptional cases where an executory order becomes impossible because of later events; it could not be used to rewrite the final order, and was dismissed as a disguised review and abuse of process. The Court also held that the signed order uploaded after chamber corrections alone constituted the final operative order. Changes from the dictated draft, including disposal with liberty to pursue remedies and omission of a status quo direction, were treated as permissible refinement and correction rather than material alteration requiring rehearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.