Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Disallowance under section 14A was confined to the exempt income actually earned, because the Tribunal followed the binding Delhi High Court view that such disallowance cannot exceed the exempt income. The assessee had earned exempt income, while the Assessing Officer computed a higher amount under Rule 8D; the Tribunal restricted the disallowance to the exempt income amount. It also held that the Explanation inserted in section 14A by the Finance Act, 2022 operates prospectively and did not apply to Assessment Year 2017-18. The appeal was partly allowed and the disallowance was restricted accordingly.
Disallowance under section 14A was confined to the exempt income actually earned, because the Tribunal followed the binding Delhi High Court view that such disallowance cannot exceed the exempt income. The assessee had earned exempt income, while the Assessing Officer computed a higher amount under Rule 8D; the Tribunal restricted the disallowance to the exempt income amount. It also held that the Explanation inserted in section 14A by the Finance Act, 2022 operates prospectively and did not apply to Assessment Year 2017-18. The appeal was partly allowed and the disallowance was restricted accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.