Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Addition treated as unexplained cash credit on an unsecured loan was deleted because the lender's identity, creditworthiness based on its financials, and the genuineness of the loan transaction from an NBFC had already been accepted on identical facts in a coordinate Bench decision. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) had sustained the addition mainly by relying on an order in a group concern's case involving the same lender, but that foundation no longer survived after the earlier order was reversed. Applying the same reasoning, the loan from M/s Sundram Consultants Pvt. Ltd. was not liable to be assessed as unexplained cash credit.
Addition treated as unexplained cash credit on an unsecured loan was deleted because the lender's identity, creditworthiness based on its financials, and the genuineness of the loan transaction from an NBFC had already been accepted on identical facts in a coordinate Bench decision. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) had sustained the addition mainly by relying on an order in a group concern's case involving the same lender, but that foundation no longer survived after the earlier order was reversed. Applying the same reasoning, the loan from M/s Sundram Consultants Pvt. Ltd. was not liable to be assessed as unexplained cash credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
