Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Addition treated as unexplained cash credit on an unsecured loan was deleted because the lender's identity, creditworthiness based on its financials, and the genuineness of the loan transaction from an NBFC had already been accepted on identical facts in a coordinate Bench decision. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) had sustained the addition mainly by relying on an order in a group concern's case involving the same lender, but that foundation no longer survived after the earlier order was reversed. Applying the same reasoning, the loan from M/s Sundram Consultants Pvt. Ltd. was not liable to be assessed as unexplained cash credit.
Addition treated as unexplained cash credit on an unsecured loan was deleted because the lender's identity, creditworthiness based on its financials, and the genuineness of the loan transaction from an NBFC had already been accepted on identical facts in a coordinate Bench decision. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) had sustained the addition mainly by relying on an order in a group concern's case involving the same lender, but that foundation no longer survived after the earlier order was reversed. Applying the same reasoning, the loan from M/s Sundram Consultants Pvt. Ltd. was not liable to be assessed as unexplained cash credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
