Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Addition treated as unexplained cash credit on an unsecured loan was deleted because the lender's identity, creditworthiness based on its financials, and the genuineness of the loan transaction from an NBFC had already been accepted on identical facts in a coordinate Bench decision. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) had sustained the addition mainly by relying on an order in a group concern's case involving the same lender, but that foundation no longer survived after the earlier order was reversed. Applying the same reasoning, the loan from M/s Sundram Consultants Pvt. Ltd. was not liable to be assessed as unexplained cash credit.
Addition treated as unexplained cash credit on an unsecured loan was deleted because the lender's identity, creditworthiness based on its financials, and the genuineness of the loan transaction from an NBFC had already been accepted on identical facts in a coordinate Bench decision. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) had sustained the addition mainly by relying on an order in a group concern's case involving the same lender, but that foundation no longer survived after the earlier order was reversed. Applying the same reasoning, the loan from M/s Sundram Consultants Pvt. Ltd. was not liable to be assessed as unexplained cash credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
