Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Where the assessee consistently followed the exclusive method of accounting, GST, sales tax and service tax refunds not routed through the profit and loss account could not be taxed as remission of liability under section 41(1) or as business income under section 28(i); the Tribunal held that the precondition for such addition was not satisfied and deleted the refunds additions for both years. The Tribunal also held that the same margin on stock converted into capital assets, already offered in the return and included in business income, could not be added again at the processing stage under section 143(1), as this would amount to double taxation. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was treated as consequential and directed to be recomputed.
Where the assessee consistently followed the exclusive method of accounting, GST, sales tax and service tax refunds not routed through the profit and loss account could not be taxed as remission of liability under section 41(1) or as business income under section 28(i); the Tribunal held that the precondition for such addition was not satisfied and deleted the refunds additions for both years. The Tribunal also held that the same margin on stock converted into capital assets, already offered in the return and included in business income, could not be added again at the processing stage under section 143(1), as this would amount to double taxation. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was treated as consequential and directed to be recomputed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
