Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Where the assessee consistently followed the exclusive method of accounting, GST, sales tax and service tax refunds not routed through the profit and loss account could not be taxed as remission of liability under section 41(1) or as business income under section 28(i); the Tribunal held that the precondition for such addition was not satisfied and deleted the refunds additions for both years. The Tribunal also held that the same margin on stock converted into capital assets, already offered in the return and included in business income, could not be added again at the processing stage under section 143(1), as this would amount to double taxation. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was treated as consequential and directed to be recomputed.
Where the assessee consistently followed the exclusive method of accounting, GST, sales tax and service tax refunds not routed through the profit and loss account could not be taxed as remission of liability under section 41(1) or as business income under section 28(i); the Tribunal held that the precondition for such addition was not satisfied and deleted the refunds additions for both years. The Tribunal also held that the same margin on stock converted into capital assets, already offered in the return and included in business income, could not be added again at the processing stage under section 143(1), as this would amount to double taxation. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was treated as consequential and directed to be recomputed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
