Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
ITAT held that cash deposits supported by recorded cash sales could not be treated as unexplained cash credit where the assessee produced purchase and sales registers, no specific discrepancy was found in sales, purchases or cash book, and the books were not rejected; absence of a stock register alone was insufficient, so the section 68 addition on that account was deleted. For the claimed capital introduction based on an alleged gift, the appellate relief was unsustainable because the new material was not properly tested through due process, including verification of the donor's identity, genuineness and creditworthiness; that issue was set aside and remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication.
ITAT held that cash deposits supported by recorded cash sales could not be treated as unexplained cash credit where the assessee produced purchase and sales registers, no specific discrepancy was found in sales, purchases or cash book, and the books were not rejected; absence of a stock register alone was insufficient, so the section 68 addition on that account was deleted. For the claimed capital introduction based on an alleged gift, the appellate relief was unsustainable because the new material was not properly tested through due process, including verification of the donor's identity, genuineness and creditworthiness; that issue was set aside and remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
