Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where income was disclosed in section 153A returns and remaining additions were only estimated or computationa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4561 to 4580 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that cash deposits supported by recorded cash sales could not be treated as unexplained cash credit where the assessee produced purchase and sales registers, no specific discrepancy was found in sales, purchases or cash book, and the books were not rejected; absence of a stock register alone was insufficient, so the section 68 addition on that account was deleted. For the claimed capital introduction based on an alleged gift, the appellate relief was unsustainable because the new material was not properly tested through due process, including verification of the donor's identity, genuineness and creditworthiness; that issue was set aside and remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication.
ITAT held that cash deposits supported by recorded cash sales could not be treated as unexplained cash credit where the assessee produced purchase and sales registers, no specific discrepancy was found in sales, purchases or cash book, and the books were not rejected; absence of a stock register alone was insufficient, so the section 68 addition on that account was deleted. For the claimed capital introduction based on an alleged gift, the appellate relief was unsustainable because the new material was not properly tested through due process, including verification of the donor's identity, genuineness and creditworthiness; that issue was set aside and remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
