Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal held that, after substitution of section 80AC from 01.04.2018, deductions under Part C of Chapter VIA, including section 80P, are admissible only if the return is furnished within the due date under section 139(1). It accepted that this amendment applies from AY 2018-19 and followed the Madras High Court ruling in Veerappampalayam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. A claim made only in a return filed in response to section 148, where no return had been filed within the section 139 due date, could not cure the default. The denial of deduction under section 80P was therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.
The Tribunal held that, after substitution of section 80AC from 01.04.2018, deductions under Part C of Chapter VIA, including section 80P, are admissible only if the return is furnished within the due date under section 139(1). It accepted that this amendment applies from AY 2018-19 and followed the Madras High Court ruling in Veerappampalayam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. A claim made only in a return filed in response to section 148, where no return had been filed within the section 139 due date, could not cure the default. The denial of deduction under section 80P was therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.