Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
The Tribunal held that, after substitution of section 80AC from 01.04.2018, deductions under Part C of Chapter VIA, including section 80P, are admissible only if the return is furnished within the due date under section 139(1). It accepted that this amendment applies from AY 2018-19 and followed the Madras High Court ruling in Veerappampalayam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. A claim made only in a return filed in response to section 148, where no return had been filed within the section 139 due date, could not cure the default. The denial of deduction under section 80P was therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.
The Tribunal held that, after substitution of section 80AC from 01.04.2018, deductions under Part C of Chapter VIA, including section 80P, are admissible only if the return is furnished within the due date under section 139(1). It accepted that this amendment applies from AY 2018-19 and followed the Madras High Court ruling in Veerappampalayam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. A claim made only in a return filed in response to section 148, where no return had been filed within the section 139 due date, could not cure the default. The denial of deduction under section 80P was therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.