Person chargeable with duty must be the importer at importation; subsequent purchasers cannot be held liable where beneficial owner rules did not appl...
Prohibited importation of cosmetics without prior regulatory registration attracts seizure and confiscation; warehousing or re export claims do not cu...
Provisional release on security permitted where cash deposit plus bond secures differential duty; classification and treaty benefits referred for deci...
The Tribunal held that, after substitution of section 80AC from 01.04.2018, deductions under Part C of Chapter VIA, including section 80P, are admissible only if the return is furnished within the due date under section 139(1). It accepted that this amendment applies from AY 2018-19 and followed the Madras High Court ruling in Veerappampalayam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. A claim made only in a return filed in response to section 148, where no return had been filed within the section 139 due date, could not cure the default. The denial of deduction under section 80P was therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.
The Tribunal held that, after substitution of section 80AC from 01.04.2018, deductions under Part C of Chapter VIA, including section 80P, are admissible only if the return is furnished within the due date under section 139(1). It accepted that this amendment applies from AY 2018-19 and followed the Madras High Court ruling in Veerappampalayam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. A claim made only in a return filed in response to section 148, where no return had been filed within the section 139 due date, could not cure the default. The denial of deduction under section 80P was therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
