Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal held that, after substitution of section 80AC from 01.04.2018, deductions under Part C of Chapter VIA, including section 80P, are admissible only if the return is furnished within the due date under section 139(1). It accepted that this amendment applies from AY 2018-19 and followed the Madras High Court ruling in Veerappampalayam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. A claim made only in a return filed in response to section 148, where no return had been filed within the section 139 due date, could not cure the default. The denial of deduction under section 80P was therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.
The Tribunal held that, after substitution of section 80AC from 01.04.2018, deductions under Part C of Chapter VIA, including section 80P, are admissible only if the return is furnished within the due date under section 139(1). It accepted that this amendment applies from AY 2018-19 and followed the Madras High Court ruling in Veerappampalayam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. A claim made only in a return filed in response to section 148, where no return had been filed within the section 139 due date, could not cure the default. The denial of deduction under section 80P was therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.