Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Imports made under an Advance Authorisation Scheme were treated as not liable to CVD for the intervening period, because the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling in M/s. Vishal Metal Industries and applied the later exemption notification retrospectively to that period where export obligation had been fulfilled. On that basis, the CVD demand was unsustainable, and the consequential confiscation, interest and penalties also could not survive. The impugned order was set aside in full and the appeals were allowed.
Imports made under an Advance Authorisation Scheme were treated as not liable to CVD for the intervening period, because the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling in M/s. Vishal Metal Industries and applied the later exemption notification retrospectively to that period where export obligation had been fulfilled. On that basis, the CVD demand was unsustainable, and the consequential confiscation, interest and penalties also could not survive. The impugned order was set aside in full and the appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
