Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Imports made under an Advance Authorisation Scheme were treated as not liable to CVD for the intervening period, because the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling in M/s. Vishal Metal Industries and applied the later exemption notification retrospectively to that period where export obligation had been fulfilled. On that basis, the CVD demand was unsustainable, and the consequential confiscation, interest and penalties also could not survive. The impugned order was set aside in full and the appeals were allowed.
Imports made under an Advance Authorisation Scheme were treated as not liable to CVD for the intervening period, because the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling in M/s. Vishal Metal Industries and applied the later exemption notification retrospectively to that period where export obligation had been fulfilled. On that basis, the CVD demand was unsustainable, and the consequential confiscation, interest and penalties also could not survive. The impugned order was set aside in full and the appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.