Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Imports made under an Advance Authorisation Scheme were treated as not liable to CVD for the intervening period, because the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling in M/s. Vishal Metal Industries and applied the later exemption notification retrospectively to that period where export obligation had been fulfilled. On that basis, the CVD demand was unsustainable, and the consequential confiscation, interest and penalties also could not survive. The impugned order was set aside in full and the appeals were allowed.
Imports made under an Advance Authorisation Scheme were treated as not liable to CVD for the intervening period, because the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling in M/s. Vishal Metal Industries and applied the later exemption notification retrospectively to that period where export obligation had been fulfilled. On that basis, the CVD demand was unsustainable, and the consequential confiscation, interest and penalties also could not survive. The impugned order was set aside in full and the appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.