Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
A HC declined to entertain a writ petition challenging GST detention and release proceedings because the tax and penalty were paid after service of notice in Form GST MOV-07 and the goods were then released, with no contemporaneous protest shown. The Court treated the proceedings as concluded upon payment, held that the penalty order was appealable, and noted that no appeal had been filed within the prescribed period. It found no demonstrated violation of natural justice or jurisdictional error to justify bypassing the statutory appellate remedy, and dismissed the petition as devoid of merit.
A HC declined to entertain a writ petition challenging GST detention and release proceedings because the tax and penalty were paid after service of notice in Form GST MOV-07 and the goods were then released, with no contemporaneous protest shown. The Court treated the proceedings as concluded upon payment, held that the penalty order was appealable, and noted that no appeal had been filed within the prescribed period. It found no demonstrated violation of natural justice or jurisdictional error to justify bypassing the statutory appellate remedy, and dismissed the petition as devoid of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
