Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2841 to 2860 of 95916 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A HC declined to entertain a writ petition challenging GST detention and release proceedings because the tax and penalty were paid after service of notice in Form GST MOV-07 and the goods were then released, with no contemporaneous protest shown. The Court treated the proceedings as concluded upon payment, held that the penalty order was appealable, and noted that no appeal had been filed within the prescribed period. It found no demonstrated violation of natural justice or jurisdictional error to justify bypassing the statutory appellate remedy, and dismissed the petition as devoid of merit.
A HC declined to entertain a writ petition challenging GST detention and release proceedings because the tax and penalty were paid after service of notice in Form GST MOV-07 and the goods were then released, with no contemporaneous protest shown. The Court treated the proceedings as concluded upon payment, held that the penalty order was appealable, and noted that no appeal had been filed within the prescribed period. It found no demonstrated violation of natural justice or jurisdictional error to justify bypassing the statutory appellate remedy, and dismissed the petition as devoid of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
