Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5081 to 5100 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAC bricks/blocks were held not to qualify as ceramic products under Chapter 69 because the manufacturing process and test material showed a sand-lime type article subjected to steam treatment in autoclaves, not goods fired after shaping or heated above the Chapter 69 threshold. The Authority applied HSN Notes and Chapter 69 Notes to conclude that heading 6810 better matched the product description. It also rejected the argument that tariff item 69041000 must prevail as a specific entry, since heading 6810 likewise contains a specific entry for building blocks and bricks. The goods were therefore classified under heading 6810, and classification under tariff item 69041000 was denied.
AAC bricks/blocks were held not to qualify as ceramic products under Chapter 69 because the manufacturing process and test material showed a sand-lime type article subjected to steam treatment in autoclaves, not goods fired after shaping or heated above the Chapter 69 threshold. The Authority applied HSN Notes and Chapter 69 Notes to conclude that heading 6810 better matched the product description. It also rejected the argument that tariff item 69041000 must prevail as a specific entry, since heading 6810 likewise contains a specific entry for building blocks and bricks. The goods were therefore classified under heading 6810, and classification under tariff item 69041000 was denied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.