Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Peak credit theory was applied to unexplained advances for land purchase, and the additional addition was deleted because the issue was already covered by the assessee's earlier years. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was removed where the lender had already recorded the interest and paid tax, so no default by the assessee was found. On job work receipts, only the income component was taxable and the 12 per cent profit estimate was sustained. Cash advances for land purchase did not attract section 40A(3) because they were advances, not claimed expenditure. Restricted interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) was upheld for unexplained advances. Artificially inflated work-in-progress based on survey surrender was reduced to avoid a future deduction for expenditure never incurred.
Peak credit theory was applied to unexplained advances for land purchase, and the additional addition was deleted because the issue was already covered by the assessee's earlier years. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was removed where the lender had already recorded the interest and paid tax, so no default by the assessee was found. On job work receipts, only the income component was taxable and the 12 per cent profit estimate was sustained. Cash advances for land purchase did not attract section 40A(3) because they were advances, not claimed expenditure. Restricted interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) was upheld for unexplained advances. Artificially inflated work-in-progress based on survey surrender was reduced to avoid a future deduction for expenditure never incurred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
