Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Peak credit theory was applied to unexplained advances for land purchase, and the additional addition was deleted because the issue was already covered by the assessee's earlier years. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was removed where the lender had already recorded the interest and paid tax, so no default by the assessee was found. On job work receipts, only the income component was taxable and the 12 per cent profit estimate was sustained. Cash advances for land purchase did not attract section 40A(3) because they were advances, not claimed expenditure. Restricted interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) was upheld for unexplained advances. Artificially inflated work-in-progress based on survey surrender was reduced to avoid a future deduction for expenditure never incurred.
Peak credit theory was applied to unexplained advances for land purchase, and the additional addition was deleted because the issue was already covered by the assessee's earlier years. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was removed where the lender had already recorded the interest and paid tax, so no default by the assessee was found. On job work receipts, only the income component was taxable and the 12 per cent profit estimate was sustained. Cash advances for land purchase did not attract section 40A(3) because they were advances, not claimed expenditure. Restricted interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) was upheld for unexplained advances. Artificially inflated work-in-progress based on survey surrender was reduced to avoid a future deduction for expenditure never incurred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.