Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
781 to 800 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TNMM comparability under transfer pricing was applied across operating expenses, software services, ITeS, distribution and manufacturing segments, with the Tribunal treating provision for doubtful debts and routine rates and taxes as operating items, revising the comparable sets on functional similarity and turnover filters, and directing gross-margin benchmarking for the distribution segment. It held that working capital differences require adjustment under TNMM and remitted quantification for fresh computation. Delayed receivables were not sustained as a notional interest adjustment on the facts, and the royalty and intra-group service payments were accepted as closely linked business transactions that could not be benchmarked at nil without proper comparability analysis. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was also deleted for lack of proof of TDS liability.
TNMM comparability under transfer pricing was applied across operating expenses, software services, ITeS, distribution and manufacturing segments, with the Tribunal treating provision for doubtful debts and routine rates and taxes as operating items, revising the comparable sets on functional similarity and turnover filters, and directing gross-margin benchmarking for the distribution segment. It held that working capital differences require adjustment under TNMM and remitted quantification for fresh computation. Delayed receivables were not sustained as a notional interest adjustment on the facts, and the royalty and intra-group service payments were accepted as closely linked business transactions that could not be benchmarked at nil without proper comparability analysis. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was also deleted for lack of proof of TDS liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.