Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Section 54 relief is available where capital gains are fully utilised for purchase of a new property before filing the return under section 139, even if the return is belated and no amount remains to be deposited in the Capital Gains Account Scheme. The text distinguishes cases where only unutilised amounts had to be deposited by the due date from cases where the entire consideration was already applied towards the new asset. It also records that the claim should be allowed subject to verification that the payments were made before filing the return, with the matter sent back for limited verification and consequential allowance if the utilisation is confirmed.
Section 54 relief is available where capital gains are fully utilised for purchase of a new property before filing the return under section 139, even if the return is belated and no amount remains to be deposited in the Capital Gains Account Scheme. The text distinguishes cases where only unutilised amounts had to be deposited by the due date from cases where the entire consideration was already applied towards the new asset. It also records that the claim should be allowed subject to verification that the payments were made before filing the return, with the matter sent back for limited verification and consequential allowance if the utilisation is confirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.