Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Bail was refused in a prosecution alleging clandestine manufacture and duty evasion under a capacity-based excise regime tied to installed packing machines. The Court held that disputed questions about actual production, machine utilisation and exact duty liability could not be decided at the bail stage, and that the applicant's claim that one machine was non-functional did not prima facie displace the statutory scheme absent a prior declaration to the competent Commissioner. Seizure of machines, raw materials and finished goods, together with Section 70 statements, furnished prima facie material of concealment and clandestine manufacture. Given the economic-offence character of the ations, continuing investigation and risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, the application was dismissed.
Bail was refused in a prosecution alleging clandestine manufacture and duty evasion under a capacity-based excise regime tied to installed packing machines. The Court held that disputed questions about actual production, machine utilisation and exact duty liability could not be decided at the bail stage, and that the applicant's claim that one machine was non-functional did not prima facie displace the statutory scheme absent a prior declaration to the competent Commissioner. Seizure of machines, raw materials and finished goods, together with Section 70 statements, furnished prima facie material of concealment and clandestine manufacture. Given the economic-offence character of the ations, continuing investigation and risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, the application was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
