Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Refund money deposited in Court could not be retained once the Department's challenge had been relegated to the statutory appeal before the Tribunal and no interim restraint was operating there. The High Court noted that the earlier order had not been adjudicated on merits, and in the absence of any Tribunal order preventing release, the deposited amount had to be returned to the petitioner. The release was directed to be made subject to any further orders passed in the Department's pending appeal before the Tribunal.
Refund money deposited in Court could not be retained once the Department's challenge had been relegated to the statutory appeal before the Tribunal and no interim restraint was operating there. The High Court noted that the earlier order had not been adjudicated on merits, and in the absence of any Tribunal order preventing release, the deposited amount had to be returned to the petitioner. The release was directed to be made subject to any further orders passed in the Department's pending appeal before the Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
