Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the GST show cause notice and consequential order, and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy instead. It permitted filing before the appellate authority within two weeks with a delay condonation application and statutory pre-deposit, and left open the request for lifting the bank lien, to be considered by the appellate authority in accordance with law.
The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the GST show cause notice and consequential order, and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy instead. It permitted filing before the appellate authority within two weeks with a delay condonation application and statutory pre-deposit, and left open the request for lifting the bank lien, to be considered by the appellate authority in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
