Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the GST show cause notice and consequential order, and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy instead. It permitted filing before the appellate authority within two weeks with a delay condonation application and statutory pre-deposit, and left open the request for lifting the bank lien, to be considered by the appellate authority in accordance with law.
The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the GST show cause notice and consequential order, and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy instead. It permitted filing before the appellate authority within two weeks with a delay condonation application and statutory pre-deposit, and left open the request for lifting the bank lien, to be considered by the appellate authority in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
