Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where income was disclosed in section 153A returns and remaining additions were only estimated or computationa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4561 to 4580 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the GST show cause notice and consequential order, and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy instead. It permitted filing before the appellate authority within two weeks with a delay condonation application and statutory pre-deposit, and left open the request for lifting the bank lien, to be considered by the appellate authority in accordance with law.
The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the GST show cause notice and consequential order, and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy instead. It permitted filing before the appellate authority within two weeks with a delay condonation application and statutory pre-deposit, and left open the request for lifting the bank lien, to be considered by the appellate authority in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
