Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Adjustment of a refund against a disputed demand during pendency of statutory remedies was held unsustainable. Following coordinate Bench rulings, the HC quashed the refund adjustment, directed release of the refund with statutory interest, and restrained coercive recovery until the stay application is decided. The Court also requested expeditious disposal of the pending appeal before the CIT(A), and did not examine the merits of the underlying assessment dispute.
Adjustment of a refund against a disputed demand during pendency of statutory remedies was held unsustainable. Following coordinate Bench rulings, the HC quashed the refund adjustment, directed release of the refund with statutory interest, and restrained coercive recovery until the stay application is decided. The Court also requested expeditious disposal of the pending appeal before the CIT(A), and did not examine the merits of the underlying assessment dispute.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
