Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Transfer of outstanding family loan balances to the proprietor's capital account was treated as a mere reclassification of existing credits, because no fresh cash was introduced in the year; section 68 therefore did not apply, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also found no evidence that the family creditors had waived recovery, so there was no cessation of liability to trigger section 41(1). On the separate entry for TDS and self-assessment tax, the movement was only a book adjustment with no undisclosed source shown and no deduction claimed, so neither section 41(1) nor section 68 was attracted. The additions were upheld as deleted.
Transfer of outstanding family loan balances to the proprietor's capital account was treated as a mere reclassification of existing credits, because no fresh cash was introduced in the year; section 68 therefore did not apply, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also found no evidence that the family creditors had waived recovery, so there was no cessation of liability to trigger section 41(1). On the separate entry for TDS and self-assessment tax, the movement was only a book adjustment with no undisclosed source shown and no deduction claimed, so neither section 41(1) nor section 68 was attracted. The additions were upheld as deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.