Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Transfer of outstanding family loan balances to the proprietor's capital account was treated as a mere reclassification of existing credits, because no fresh cash was introduced in the year; section 68 therefore did not apply, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also found no evidence that the family creditors had waived recovery, so there was no cessation of liability to trigger section 41(1). On the separate entry for TDS and self-assessment tax, the movement was only a book adjustment with no undisclosed source shown and no deduction claimed, so neither section 41(1) nor section 68 was attracted. The additions were upheld as deleted.
Transfer of outstanding family loan balances to the proprietor's capital account was treated as a mere reclassification of existing credits, because no fresh cash was introduced in the year; section 68 therefore did not apply, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also found no evidence that the family creditors had waived recovery, so there was no cessation of liability to trigger section 41(1). On the separate entry for TDS and self-assessment tax, the movement was only a book adjustment with no undisclosed source shown and no deduction claimed, so neither section 41(1) nor section 68 was attracted. The additions were upheld as deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.