Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1321 to 1340 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Capital gains for AY 2016-17 had to be recomputed by correcting an assessment-year mismatch, excluding a property transfer recorded in the succeeding year and including the deed relating to the year under consideration. The Tribunal also treated one sale entry as a duplicate because the later document merely rectified an error in the earlier deed, so only the corrected transaction could be counted. For the co-owned property sale, where the deed did not specify separate shares, the assessee's taxable share was restricted to one-fifth of the total consideration. The assessment was revised accordingly.
Capital gains for AY 2016-17 had to be recomputed by correcting an assessment-year mismatch, excluding a property transfer recorded in the succeeding year and including the deed relating to the year under consideration. The Tribunal also treated one sale entry as a duplicate because the later document merely rectified an error in the earlier deed, so only the corrected transaction could be counted. For the co-owned property sale, where the deed did not specify separate shares, the assessee's taxable share was restricted to one-fifth of the total consideration. The assessment was revised accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.