Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where income was disclosed in section 153A returns and remaining additions were only estimated or computationa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4561 to 4580 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In search assessment under section 153A, an estimated commission addition was unsustainable because only copies of registered sale deeds were found, and no incriminating material showed brokerage activity or receipt of commission; the Tribunal held the addition was based only on assumption and presumption and affirmed its deletion. A protective addition for alleged cash expenditure also failed because the seized documents were owned up by another person, supported by affidavit, and had already been considered in settlement proceedings; once no further addition was called for on those documents, the protective basis disappeared. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld deletion of both additions.
In search assessment under section 153A, an estimated commission addition was unsustainable because only copies of registered sale deeds were found, and no incriminating material showed brokerage activity or receipt of commission; the Tribunal held the addition was based only on assumption and presumption and affirmed its deletion. A protective addition for alleged cash expenditure also failed because the seized documents were owned up by another person, supported by affidavit, and had already been considered in settlement proceedings; once no further addition was called for on those documents, the protective basis disappeared. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld deletion of both additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
