Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
In search assessment under section 153A, an estimated commission addition was unsustainable because only copies of registered sale deeds were found, and no incriminating material showed brokerage activity or receipt of commission; the Tribunal held the addition was based only on assumption and presumption and affirmed its deletion. A protective addition for alleged cash expenditure also failed because the seized documents were owned up by another person, supported by affidavit, and had already been considered in settlement proceedings; once no further addition was called for on those documents, the protective basis disappeared. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld deletion of both additions.
In search assessment under section 153A, an estimated commission addition was unsustainable because only copies of registered sale deeds were found, and no incriminating material showed brokerage activity or receipt of commission; the Tribunal held the addition was based only on assumption and presumption and affirmed its deletion. A protective addition for alleged cash expenditure also failed because the seized documents were owned up by another person, supported by affidavit, and had already been considered in settlement proceedings; once no further addition was called for on those documents, the protective basis disappeared. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld deletion of both additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.