Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
The Tribunal dealt with three business expenditure claims. It deleted disallowance of input tax credit reversal because the amount was shown to form part of total project cost and was apportioned between cost of sales and closing work-in-progress, so the factual basis for rejection failed. It remanded the claim for advances written off as trading loss because the assessee had to first establish business purpose and irrecoverability, and was allowed to produce further evidence. It sustained disallowance of social activity and charitable expenditure, holding that charitable outlays and an unexplained training fee had no demonstrated nexus with the real estate business.
The Tribunal dealt with three business expenditure claims. It deleted disallowance of input tax credit reversal because the amount was shown to form part of total project cost and was apportioned between cost of sales and closing work-in-progress, so the factual basis for rejection failed. It remanded the claim for advances written off as trading loss because the assessee had to first establish business purpose and irrecoverability, and was allowed to produce further evidence. It sustained disallowance of social activity and charitable expenditure, holding that charitable outlays and an unexplained training fee had no demonstrated nexus with the real estate business.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
